Job Posting: User Interface (UI) Engineer at ESRI
We are actively looking for a full-time User Interface (UI) Engineer here in Professional Services (Applications Development Services) at ESRI.
If you feel qualified and are interested please send me your resume to mgaigg at esri dot com. I'm also happy to answer any kind of question (except payment) you might have.
My job here
A little bit about what you can expect here: In my daily job I consult, design and help implementing customized web applications that are for the most part based on our core mapping products and API's for JavaScript, Flex and Silverlight. Clients range from local and federal government to vertical markets like energy, water, environmental, etc. and reach local, domestic and international audiences - the challenges are never-ending, I promise
You can become part of this group!
Job Description
Use your technical background and innovative visual design skills to simplify complex business processes through the creation of intuitive and visually engaging user interfaces.
Responsibilities
- Create sophisticated, imaginative, efficient, and visually striking interfaces for front-end solutions
- Design reusable UI components by utilizing or building UI framework components
- Develop storyboards, mock-ups, and prototypes to communicate ideas for navigation and interaction models
- Evaluate requirements and initial mock-ups; make technology recommendations that support optimal construction, maintenance, and performance
- Translate complex functional and technical requirements into detailed architecture and design prototypes
- Ensure cross-browser/platform integrity of Web designs
- Work closely with software developers and software testers to create a working end-to-end solution
- Define, maintain, implement, and enforce style guides, standards, reusable templates, and best practices for client-side software development
- Leverage the latest developments in Internet technologies
- Serve as a technical resource and mentor
Requirements
- Bachelor’s or master’s in computer science, graphic design, visual design, human factors engineering, interaction design, information architecture, or other relevant field
- A minimum of five years of experience in user interface design, information architecture, user-centered design methodology, and implementation in complex enterprise environments
- Significant and proven experience demonstrating innovative UI visual design skills
- Ability to balance designs with the understanding of technical constraints within a software development environment
- Highly proficient with cross-browser/platform CSS, HTML, XHTML, and JavaScript; knowledge of browser compatibility issues and their workarounds
- Extensive experience using JavaScript libraries such as Dojo and jQuery
- Good understanding of user experience (UX) and user-centered design (UCD)
- Ability to take a concept from sketch to final implementation
- Ability and willingness to take ownership of projects and help drive them to effective implementation
- Exceptional attention to detail, organizational, communication, and presentation skills
- Passionate about novel user interface design and software development
Recommended Qualifications
- Experience with GIS/ESRI products and solutions
- Experience with .NET, C#, Silverlight, and Expression Blend
- Experience with JSP, Java Web frameworks, Flash, and ActionScript
- Experience with Linux, PHP, and MySQL
- Proficiency with Adobe Creative Suite including InDesign, Photoshop, and Illustrator
- Ability to interface with customers, gather requirements, and implement new solutions
Employment Fraction
Full-time
Work Location
ESRI Headquarters, Redlands, CA
User-Centered Design (UCD) Methods: Comparison and Overview
This is the first in a series of blogs describing User-centered Design Methods. My goal is to summarize my experience, insights and findings across multiple literature and compile them into easy and quick to digest pieces for you to consume. I want to encourage you to comment your own experiences and give me feedback on why your company applies certain methods differently or not at all or something else altogether.
I personally don't like the term Usability too much, it's an empty buzz word. It means SOMETHING to everybody but isn't scientific enough to be taken serious. It's often interpreted wrongly and purely misunderstood by most. It's kinda like Psychology, we know it is important to understand fundamental human behavior, their problems and remedies, but I wouldn't pay a dime to go to a Psychologist. But who knows, just as Psychology got its scientific relevance and acknowledgment - partly maybe through the 'invention' of the IQ - hopefully Usability rises up to similar levels (Jeff Sauro offers interesting metrics via SUM (Single Usability Metric).
That's why I like the term User-centered Design. It works wonders with Project Managers and the-like, probably because Design is such an important term in their daily work. And when asked about Usability testing I can conveniently point out that this is only one tool of many in my UCD toolbox. But the really important sales trick is to know which UCD method is best used at what time in the project management cycle.
The following chart compares the most common user-centered design methods, outlines their cost and shows when to use them:
Overview of user-centered design methods
| Method | Cost | Output | Sample Size | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitive Studies | Medium | Stat. & Non-Stat. | 5 | Requirements |
| Focus Groups | High | Non-Statistical | 6-9 | Requirements |
| Field Studies | High | Non-Statistical | 2-3 | Requirements |
| Heuristic Evaluation | Low | Statistical | 2-3 | Design |
| Paper Prototyping | Medium | Stat. & Non-Stat. | 5 | Design |
| Card Sorting | High | Statistical | 15-20 | Design |
| Participatory Design | Low | Non-Statistical | n/a | Design |
| User Testing | Medium | Stat. & Non-Stat. | 5 | Design & Evaluation |
| Surveys | Low | Statistical | 20+ | Requirements & Evaluation |
| Interviews | High | Non-Statistical | 3-5 | Requirements & Evaluation |
| Server Traffic Log Analysis | Low | Statistical | n/a | Evaluation |
| Search Log Analysis | Low | Statistical | n/a | Evaluation |
Not long ago, after having completed a full project management cycle (requirements, design, implementation and evaluation) the PM proudly announced to perform a Focus Group with his stakeholders. Showing the ready application, he thought, would surely impress them and lead to valuable feedback for the next milestone. This impulse isn't uncommon but has to be fought before it becomes reality. Does he really want to produce MORE and EXPENSIVE requirements? Because that's the output of Focus Groups. Wouldn't he be better off running 2 iterations of User Testing to reveal usability issues or a Survey to receive input from outside the development environment?
Recommendations
- Requirements:
- Competitive Studies
- Interviews
- Field Studies
- Design:
- Heuristic Evaluation
- Paper Prototyping
- User Testing
- Evaluation:
- Surveys
- Server Traffic Log Analysis
- Search Log Analysis
- User Testing
- The Usability effort is NOT proportional to the size of the project. Bigger projects spend less percentage on UCD with same effort. Regardless, as a rule of thumb assign 10% of the projects budget for UCD.
- Faster iterations of prototype design require less testers
References
- Fidgeon, T.; User-centered design (UCD) - 6 methods; Nov. 2005; http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-usability/user-centered-design.shtml
- IBM; User-Centered Design Principles; https://www-01.ibm.com/software/ucd/
- Nielsen, J.; Field Studies Done Right: Fast and Observational; 01/20/2002; http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20020120.html
- Nielsen, J.; How Big is the Difference Between Websites; 01/19/2004; http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040119.html
- Usability in Practice: Three-Day Intensive Camp; Nielsen, J. et. al.; April 2006; Proceeding, Usability Week 2006
