Comments on: Section 508: WCAG 1.0 or WCAG 2.0? http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/2009/01/27/section-508-wcag-10-or-wcag-20/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:58:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: IT Solutions Blog » Richtlinien für barrierefreie Webinhalte (WCAG) 2.0 (German) http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/2009/01/27/section-508-wcag-10-or-wcag-20/comment-page-1/#comment-541 IT Solutions Blog » Richtlinien für barrierefreie Webinhalte (WCAG) 2.0 (German) Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:54:29 +0000 http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/?p=279#comment-541 [...] I also suggest you to have a look at my blog entries about WCAG 2.0: Overview and Structure and Section 508: WCAG 1.0 or WCAG 2.0? [...] [...] I also suggest you to have a look at my blog entries about WCAG 2.0: Overview and Structure and Section 508: WCAG 1.0 or WCAG 2.0? [...]

]]> By: Accessibility News and Links » Free Xenon Consulting http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/2009/01/27/section-508-wcag-10-or-wcag-20/comment-page-1/#comment-518 Accessibility News and Links » Free Xenon Consulting Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:40:26 +0000 http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/?p=279#comment-518 [...] says that Section 508 will, most likely in 2011, follow WCAG 2.0 [...] [...] says that Section 508 will, most likely in 2011, follow WCAG 2.0 [...]

]]> By: dboudreau's status on Friday, 26-Jun-09 14:38:16 UTC - Identi.ca http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/2009/01/27/section-508-wcag-10-or-wcag-20/comment-page-1/#comment-291 dboudreau's status on Friday, 26-Jun-09 14:38:16 UTC - Identi.ca Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:38:10 +0000 http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/?p=279#comment-291 [...] Pour ceux qui cherchent à savoir si la prochaine version de Section 508 sera basée sur WCAG 1.0 ou WCAG 2.0 : http://tinyurl.com/knj3va [...] [...] Pour ceux qui cherchent à savoir si la prochaine version de Section 508 sera basée sur WCAG 1.0 ou WCAG 2.0 : http://tinyurl.com/knj3va [...]

]]> By: Michael Gaigg http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/2009/01/27/section-508-wcag-10-or-wcag-20/comment-page-1/#comment-284 Michael Gaigg Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:36:17 +0000 http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/?p=279#comment-284 Thanks for this comment DD, you are absolutely right. I've updated the blog entry to reflect this. Thanks for this comment DD, you are absolutely right. I've updated the blog entry to reflect this.

]]> By: DD http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/2009/01/27/section-508-wcag-10-or-wcag-20/comment-page-1/#comment-282 DD Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:15:12 +0000 http://www.michaelgaigg.com/blog/?p=279#comment-282 The target.com case was not based on Section 508. Reading the linked settlement document, "The amended complaint alleged that Target was violating the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code §§ 51 et seq., the Disabled Persons Act, California Civil Code §§ 54 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181 et seq." Please be careful when citing the target.com case in that 508 plays no role. Your one-sentence paragraph should reflect this. The target.com case was not based on Section 508. Reading the linked settlement document, "The amended complaint alleged that Target was violating the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code §§ 51 et seq., the Disabled Persons Act, California Civil Code §§ 54 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181 et seq."

Please be careful when citing the target.com case in that 508 plays no role. Your one-sentence paragraph should reflect this.

]]>